Düşünceler Hakkında Bilmek C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir
Düşünceler Hakkında Bilmek C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir
Blog Article
Best practice to create typed collections/lists with internal or private Add, Remove functionality? 2
Is there any reason to expose an internal collection kakım a ReadOnlyCollection rather than an IEnumerable if the calling code only iterates over the collection?
1 Bey long birli WritableMyItem is made private, kakım @KlausGütter suggested, this solution seems to work great. The other problem I thought I would face is if the IReadOnlyList is casted into a IList, but since IList's type parameter is hamiş covariant, I don't think this is possible. Thank you!
If you (Class A) continue to modify the underlying collection after you hand it out birli a ReadOnlyCollection then class B will see these changes, have any iterators invalidated, etc. and generally be open to any of the usual concurrency issues with collections.
Creating an extension method is sufficiently different in C# that it's worth taking the time to do the translation. A C# extension method is a static method declared in a static class, and its first parameter must be declared using the "this" keyword. So the C# version of C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nasıl Kullanılır this method looks like this: public static class PhvExtensionMethods
Anyway, I believe that a domain object should be read-write, because at the end of the day, a domain object describes an C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri entity C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri within the domain and you should be able to access and modify it.
What's the best way to pass around lists of values C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nasıl Kullanılır without lots of code clutter (such birli explicit type parameters) but that still communicates intent clearly?
HashTable hash kodlarına için dizdiğinden muayyen bir sıralaması yoktur.Algoritması bu kodların süresince gizlidr. Dictionary ise verilerin ekleniş sırasını hiç değhizmettirmeden saklamıştır.
Does this double well potential contradict the fact that there is no degeneracy for one-dimensional bound states?
If you do this then there's nothing stopping your callers casting the IEnumerable back to ICollection and then modifying it. ReadOnlyCollection removes this possibility, although it's still possible to access the underlying writable collection via reflection.
Descendants(IEnumerable) Returns a collection of elements that contains the descendant elements of every element and document in the source collection.
This answer already assumes you want to return IEnumerable without any reasoning to support that decision.
On the other hand, let's say you have a ReadOnlyCollection(StringBuilder). This is kind of a C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nerelerde Kullanılıyor strange thing to have, but it is acceptable. You hayat still change the individual StringBuilder objects by accessing their methods.
Verimlilik: Kuyruk kuruluşsı, verilerin sıralı olarak teamüllenmesi gereken sert çok senaryoda kullanılır ve bu hâl yazılımın başarımını fazlalıkrabilir.